No Ciggy! A+ :-) - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=AEM?= - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - Les Cargill - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=AEM?= - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - Les Cargill - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=AEM?= - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - Other than that Mr. Kennedy, what'd you think of Dallas - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
MŪM wrote:
> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june09/tobacco_06-11.html
It amazes me that if a Ford car, or Kellogg cereal, or *lettuce* had
*any* possible health issues that cigarettes produce, it would be a
no brainier to have the FDA involved, or either second question why
cigarettes are even produced and sold to public.
At least you get high smoking pot ;-} .
Convert the tobacco farms to corn fields.
Damn .. people are stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than that Mr. Kennedy, what'd you think of Dallas wrote:
> MŪM wrote:
>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june09/tobacco_06-11.html
>
>
> It amazes me that if a Ford car, or Kellogg cereal, or *lettuce* had
> *any* possible health issues that cigarettes produce, it would be a
> no brainier to have the FDA involved, or either second question why
> cigarettes are even produced and sold to public.
>
> At least you get high smoking pot ;-} .
>
> Convert the tobacco farms to corn fields.
>
> Damn .. people are stupid.
>
Most...are.
Contrast...rocks.
:-) M
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - Les Cargill - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
Other than that Mr. Kennedy, what'd you think of Dallas wrote:
> MŪM wrote:
>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june09/tobacco_06-11.html
>
>
> It amazes me that if a Ford car, or Kellogg cereal, or *lettuce* had
> *any* possible health issues that cigarettes produce, it would be a
> no brainier to have the FDA involved,
Do you believe having the FDA involved will improve anything? Of so,
why? How?
> or either second question why
> cigarettes are even produced and sold to public.
>
There are very good reasons why.
> At least you get high smoking pot ;-} .
>
> Convert the tobacco farms to corn fields.
>
> Damn .. people are stupid.
>
They are, and they aren't. People smoke because it's worth it to them.
--
Les Cargill
|
|
|
|
Re: No Ciggy! A+ :-) - Billy Brit - 6-:12 -0-09-20
|
|
Les Cargill wrote:
> They are, and they aren't. People smoke because it's worth it to them.
Kiss a smoker, kiss an ashtray. That's what my nan always used to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Les Cargill wrote:
> Other than that Mr. Kennedy, what'd you think of Dallas wrote:
>> MŪM wrote:
>>> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june09/tobacco_06-11.html
>>
>>
>> It amazes me that if a Ford car, or Kellogg cereal, or *lettuce* had
>> *any* possible health issues that cigarettes produce, it would be a
>> no brainier to have the FDA involved,
>
> Do you believe having the FDA involved will improve anything? Of so,
> why? How?
>
>> or either second question why
>> cigarettes are even produced and sold to public.
>>
>
> There are very good reasons why.
>
>> At least you get high smoking pot ;-} .
>>
>> Convert the tobacco farms to corn fields.
>>
>> Damn .. people are stupid.
>>
>
> They are, and they aren't. People smoke because it's worth it to them -to be stupid.
>
> --
> Les Cargill
T
|
|
|
|
|
