|
|
Guitar Discussions -> TO: People with an online "control others" fetish...
There are 10 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 1 to 10.
|
TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22*M=5C=5C=AE/M*_=22?= - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
"good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL, and the freedoms we 'enjoy'
in the USA, gambling, prostitution, gang warfare in our cities, the
world's largest prison population, a completely class-based healthcare
system for some, tobacco/cancer, alcoholism and a culture that fosters
it, drug escapism and a culture that created it, an institutionalized
D.o.D. / biz culture that siphons off MASSIVE value from GDP...isn't
itself... -------------> "CHAOS".
Very precious little is as it's made to appear. All you needed to do at
age 13 and >, was check out a fat chick in makeup and and a
caboose-hiding dress to know that...up is down and left is right. Day is
night and true justice is a dream- an ideal.
"A man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?"
-Robert K. Browning
:-) M
> >
> http://tinyurl.com/32j32m >
> >
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... -
|
|
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
<Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>"good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>
>As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
You mean like constantly changing your nym so others can't easily
ignore you if they wish? That sounds like the definition of a control
freak to me.
Grow up and find your balls, if possible.
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22*M=5C=5C=AE/M*_=22?= - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
salty@dog.com wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
> <Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>
>> Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>> mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>> "good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>>
>> As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
>
> You mean like const-
?
What'd it say? Was it real important? -Didn't have time- good luck with
your control others online issues man :-). M
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - Rick N. Backer - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
<salty@dog.com> wrote in message
news:gnek459qv9rn91e6k9cfopun3fa5r20ng2@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
> <Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>
>>Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>>mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>>"good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>>
>>As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
>
> You mean like constantly changing your nym so others can't easily
> ignore you if they wish? That sounds like the definition of a control
> freak to me.
You mean like constantly whining about name shifts. Marc makes them stand
out like a sore thumb so, unless you really like your fingers beat flat with
a hammer, why do you keep fucking opening his stuff if you don't like it?
Does the term 'stunned cunt' sound familiar? If not, I suggest you get
friendly with it because you sure sound like one.
No likee? No clickee!!
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online attempt 2 "control others" fetish... - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22*M=5C=5C=AE/M*_=22?= - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
Rick N. Backer wrote:
>
> <salty@dog.com> wrote in message
> news:gnek459qv9rn91e6k9cfopun3fa5r20ng2@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
>> <Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>>> mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>>> "good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>>>
>>> As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
>>
>> You mean like constantly changing your nym so others can't easily
>> ignore you if they wish? That sounds like the definition of a control
>> freak to me.
>
> You mean like constantly whining about name shifts. Marc makes them
> stand out like a sore thumb so, unless you really like your fingers beat
> flat with a hammer, why do you keep fucking opening his stuff if you
> don't like it? Does the term 'stunned cunt' sound familiar? If not, I
> suggest you get friendly with it because you sure sound like one.
>
> No likee? No clickee!!
All the *H88rz* are being picked on "...wah....sob...sniff...
those mean "libs"...wah...I want my Dick Cheyney doll..."
;-) M
>
http://tinyurl.com/32j32m >
>
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - Billy Brit - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
Rick N. Backer wrote:
> Does the term 'stunned cunt' sound familiar?
Is that a Canadian thing?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... -
|
|
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:48:16 -0700, "Rick N. Backer"
<ken.wilson@shawNO.caSPAM> wrote:
>
><salty@dog.com> wrote in message
>news:gnek459qv9rn91e6k9cfopun3fa5r20ng2@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
>> <Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>>>mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>>>"good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>>>
>>>As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
>>
>> You mean like constantly changing your nym so others can't easily
>> ignore you if they wish? That sounds like the definition of a control
>> freak to me.
>
>You mean like constantly whining about name shifts. Marc makes them stand
>out like a sore thumb so, unless you really like your fingers beat flat with
>a hammer, why do you keep fucking opening his stuff if you don't like it?
>Does the term 'stunned cunt' sound familiar? If not, I suggest you get
>friendly with it because you sure sound like one.
>
>No likee? No clickee!!
Interesting that you, and what's his name, run around calling everyone
a cunt or a "vaj". Makes me think neither of you have ever seen one.
Otherwise, why the confusion?
I have hardly been "constantly whining". I posted a comment with some
constructive advice and ind=formation that contained no whining. Your
powers of observation and ability for critical thinking are
demonstrably weak.
Go pout elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22*M=5C=5C=AE/M*_=22?= - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
salty@dog.com wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:48:16 -0700, "Rick N. Backer"
> <ken.wilson@shawNO.caSPAM> wrote:
>
>> <salty@dog.com> wrote in message
>> news:gnek459qv9rn91e6k9cfopun3fa5r20ng2@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
>>> <Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>>>> mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>>>> "good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>>>>
>>>> As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
>>> You mean like constantly changing your nym so others can't easily
>>> ignore you if they wish? That sounds like the definition of a control
>>> freak to me.
>> You mean like constantly whining about name shifts. Marc makes them stand
>> out like a sore thumb so, unless you really like your fingers beat flat with
>> a hammer, why do you keep fucking opening his stuff if you don't like it?
>> Does the term 'stunned cunt' sound familiar? If not, I suggest you get
>> friendly with it because you sure sound like one.
>>
>> No likee? No clickee!!
>
> Interesting that you, and what's his name, run around calling everyone
> a cunt or a "vaj". Makes me think neither of you have ever seen one.
> Otherwise, why the confusion?
>
> I have hardly been "constantly whining". I posted a comment with some
> constructive advice and ind=formation that contained no whining. Your
> powers of observation and ability for critical thinking are
> demonstrably weak.
>
> Go pout elsewhere.
Your entire _face_ is a Vaj fella! This thread is giving you a wet
collar, right down to your slender lil shoulders. ACK! ack ack ack ack
ackk...
Here- Grab a vibrator with a big fat head, plunge it up onto your 1/8"
high "forehead" and make the most of it.
HHHHhhhhhhhhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmm. eek!
;-) M
>
> http://tinyurl.com32j32m >
>
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22*M=5C=5C=AE/M*_=22?= - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TO: People with an online "control others" fetish... - WeReo_ScoTTy - 6-:30 -0-09-20
|
|
<salty@dog.com> wrote in message
news:gnek459qv9rn91e6k9cfopun3fa5r20ng2@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:11:09 -0700, "*M\\®/M* "
> <Be~the-BestMan?!@peacecool2.org> wrote:
>
>>Amusingly, the 60's TV show and movie spinoffs, *GET* *SMART* featured a
>>mythical "Chaos" the eeeeeveal Rooskies vs. "Control", the erstwhile
>>"good guys", 'us'. Tee-hee laugh track and all...
>>
>>As if the KGB wasn't *all* about CONTROL,
>
> You mean like constantly changing your nym so others can't easily
> ignore you if they wish? That sounds like the definition of a control
> freak to me.
>
> Grow up and find your balls, if possible.
There's a parasite that grows on the newsgroups. No, a real live parasite.
|
|
|
|
1 |
|